DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
34-2021-00313174-CU-CD-GDS·sacramento·Civil·Complex Civil
Hearing about 3 years agoThe Court has read and considered the Joint Case Management Statement. NO APPEARANCE REQUIRED. Further conference scheduled.

Sandra & John Glaeser vs. Lennar Homes of California, Inc.

Case Management Conference

Hearing date
Jul 27, 2023
Department
28
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Oct 26, 2023
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSandra Glaeser
PlaintiffJohn Glaeser
DefendantLennar Homes of California, Inc.

Ruling

34-2021-00313174-CU-CD-GDS: Sandra & John Glaeser vs. Lennar Homes of California, Inc. 07/27/2023 Case Management Conference - Complex in Department 28

Tentative Ruling

The Court has read and considered the Joint Case Management Statement filed by the parties and now issues the following tentative ruling: NO APPEARANCE REQUIRED.

FURTHER CONFERENCE A Case Management Conference is scheduled for 10/26/2023 at 01:30 PM in Department 28.

The parties shall file and email to the department a Joint Case Management Statement no later than 15 calendar days prior to the next CMC.

To request oral argument on this matter, you must call Department 28 at (916) 874-6695 by 4:00 p.m., the court day before this hearing and notification of oral argument must be made to the opposing party/counsel. If no call is made, the tentative ruling becomes the order of the court. (Local Rule 1.06.) Parties requesting services of a court reporter will need to arrange for private court reporter services at their own expense, pursuant to Government code §68086 and California Rules of Court, Rule 2.956.

Requirements for requesting a court reporter are listed in the Policy for Official Reporter Pro Tempore available on the Sacramento Superior Court website at https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/court-reporters/docs/crtrp-6a.pdf. Parties may contact Court- Approved Official Reporters Pro Tempore by utilizing the list of Court Approved Official Reporters Pro Tempore available at https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/court-reporters/docs/crtrp- 13.Pdf

A Stipulation and Appointment of Official Reporter Pro Tempore (CV/E-206) is required to be signed by each party, the private court reporter, and the Judge prior to the hearing, if not using a reporter from the Court's Approved Official Reporter Pro Tempore list, Once the form is signed it must be filed with the clerk.

If a litigant has been granted a fee waiver and requests a court reporter, the party must submit a Request for Court Reporter by a Party with a Fee Waiver (CV/E-211) and it must be filed with the clerk at least 10 days prior to the hearing or at the time the proceeding is scheduled if less than 10 days away. Once approved, the clerk will be forward the form to the Court Reporter's Office and an official reporter will be provided.

Please check your tentative ruling prior to the next Court date at www.saccourt.ca.gov prior to the above referenced hearing date.

If oral argument is requested, the parties are encouraged to attend via Zoom with the links below: To join by Zoom link - https://saccourt-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/my/sscdept28

34-2021-00313174-CU-CD-GDS: Sandra & John Glaeser vs. Lennar Homes of California, Inc. 07/27/2023 Case Management Conference - Complex in Department 28

To join by phone dial (833) 568-8864 ID 16039062174

Please note that the Complex Civil Case Department now provides information to assist you in managing your complex case on the Court website at https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/civil/complex-civil-cases.aspx. The Court strongly encourages parties to review this website regularly to stay abreast of the most recent complex civil case procedures. Please refer to the website before directly contacting the Court Clerk for information.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share