Ivicevic – Conservatorship

because such consideration would deprive the respondent of an opportunity to counter the argument.’ [Citations.]” (Jay v. Mahaffey (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 1522, 1537.)

Here, no good cause is shown for failure to raise this argument in Respondent’s moving papers, and Petitioner has not had an opportunity to reply. Nor is the argument strictly responsive to any argument made for the first time in opposition. The Court therefore declines to consider this argument.

For the foregoing reasons, the motion to quash subpoenas is DENIED.

Counsel for Petitioner is ordered to give notice of this ruling.

00984617 Ivicevic – Conservatorship TENTATIVE RULING Case: Ivicevic – Conservatorship 00984617

Calendar No.: 7

Date: 06/03/2026

MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL (ROA 308)

Attorney Kyle A. Patrick seeks to be relieved as counsel for Craig Ivicevic.

An attorney’s right to withdraw as counsel is conditioned upon compliance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1362. Counsel has fully complied. The court finds good cause to relieve Kyle A. Patrick as counsel for Craig Ivicevic.

The motion is GRANTED.

Withdrawal is effective upon filing the proof of service of the signed Order Granting Attorney’s Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel.

01459618 Ramirez – Probate TENTATIVE RULING Case: Ramirez – Probate 01459618

Calendar No.: 9

Date: 06/03/2026