Request for Order – Child Custody/Visitation
Ava Hajirassouliha (Mother) filed a Request for Order on April 1, 2026, seeking enforcement of existing custody and visitation orders arguing that Hamid Rassouli (Father) is not adhering to the schedule agreed to by the parties following his relocation to Walnut Creek.
The parties were referred to Marin Family Court Services (FCS) for child custody recommending counseling and mediation. FCS prepared a report dated May 19, 2026. Mother filed a statement of disagreement with the recommendations in the report.
The Court has reviewed the Mediated Custody Agreement entered into by the parties in February 2021. (Attached to this Order for the convenience of the parties.) That agreement provides, in relevant part, that the children, Hannah (DOB 10-24-2013) and Ryan (DOB 7-14-2010), shall be with Father every Monday, Thursday, and Sunday, and Fridays by agreement.
Following Father’s relocation to Walnut Creek, he has not performed consistent with the mediated agreement. Father has indicated that he hopes to be able to return to Mill Valley when he is allowed to work remotely. But Father reports he is currently required to work in the office five days a week from 8:00 am to 6:00 pm.
Father is required to comply with the terms of the Mediated Custody Agreement. If he is unable to provide the level of shared custody for the children, he may be required to provide support to Mother in the form of assistance until such time as he is able to return to Mill Valley (or the surrounding area).
The parties are ordered to appear. (They may appear by Zoom.)
As authorized by CRC Rule 5.125, the Court shall prepare the Findings and Order After Hearing.
FL1803535
Parties must comply with Marin County Superior Court Local Rules, Rule 7.12(B), (C), which provide that if a party wants to present oral argument, the party must contact the Court at (415) 444-7046 and all opposing parties by 4:00 p.m. the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Notice may be by telephone or in person to all other parties that argument is being requested (i.e., it is not necessary to speak with counsel or parties directly.) Unless the Court and all parties have been notified of a request to present oral argument, no oral argument will be permitted except by order of the Court. In the event no party requests oral argument in accordance with Rule 7.12(C), the tentative ruling shall become the order of the court.
IT IS ORDERED that evidentiary hearings shall be in-person in Department B. For routine appearances, the parties may access Department B for video conference via a link on the court website. Litigants in the virtual courtroom are required to leave the video screen on and wait for your case to be called.
FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are responsible for ensuring that they have a good connection and that they are available for the hearing. If the connection is inadequate, the Court may proceed with the hearing in the party’s absence.
woe e ot St TLE) Marin Family Court Services FEB 18.2021 Room 116 Civic Center San Rafael, CA 94903 JAMES ut XM, court Bxcoutive Offic
By: S. Boad,¢ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARIN MEDIATED CUSTODY AGREEMENT
Petitioner: Hamid Rassouli Case #: FL1803535 Respondent: Ava Hajirassouliha Court Date: 2-24-21 Report Date: 2-10-21 Courtroom: H
Children: Hannah DOB: 10-24-13 Age: 7 years, 3 months Ryan 7-14-10 10 years, 6 months
THE PARENTS HEREBY AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING
Child Custody
1. The parties shall share joint legal custody and joint physical custody of the children.
‘Timeshare
2. The children shall be with Father every Monday, Thursday and Sunday, and Fridays by agreement of the parents.
3. The children shall be with Mother every Tuesday, Wednesday, Friday and Saturday.
4. Weekday drop-offs shall occur at 8:00AM at the children’s schools if school is open for in person learning by the parent returning the children. Weekday pickups shall occur at the children’s schools by the parent receiving the children.
5. Weekend exchanges shall occur at 9:00AM at the home of the parent receiving the children.
6. Neither parent is permitted to drop off the children at the other parent’s home sooner or later than the schedule above unless the earlier or late drop-off time has been requested and the other parent has accepted the request.
7. Late drop offs shall be communicated with the other parent in advance and shall occur only by agreement.
Rassouli/Hajirassouliha Page 1 of 3,
6 fey 8. The custodial parent shall allow the children to freely call or Facetime the non-custodial parent at any time they wish. The non-custodial parent is allowed to call or Facetime the children between 7-8&8pm on any day that they children are not in his/her custody.
Holidays
9. The holidays shall be shared by the parents, as communicated and agreed upon.
Collateral Issues
10. The parties agree that the United States is the country of habitual residence of the children and that California is the home state of the children. The parties further agree this Marin County Superior Court has jurisdiction over the issue of child custody and to ask this court to render an order for custody in accordance with this agreement.
11. Neither party shall relocate with the children without the other party’s written consent within Marin County if the relocation results in the children’s ineligibility to enroll in the same school districts.
12. Neither party is permitted to travel with the children outside the nine Bay Area counties without agreement of the other parent. The traveling parent shall provide the other parent with an itinerary, contact information, the location where the children will be when away, and a copy of the children’s flight information, if applicable.
13. Neither party is permitted to travel with the children outside USA without written agreement of the other parent.
14. The parties shall provide each other with at least a 30-day advance notice of any trips they wish to take the children on more than one week, and must obtain the other parent’s written consent.
15. The parties shall ensure that all the children’s homework assignments are completed when the children are in his or her custody.
16. The parties are prohibited from using the children as messengers to obtain information about the affairs in the other parent’s home and personal life.
17. The parties are prohibited from disparaging the other parent in the hearing distance of the Children, either to the children or to third parties. The parties shall not allow any other parties to disparage the other parent in the hearing distance of the children. The parties agree to support and encourage the children’s relationship with the other parent.
Rassouli/Hajirassoultha
"y << Go
we Ye
Petifioner:. MG, ple Date: _ 2/42/2021
Respondeiit: a | _ Date: 2/1 5/2 02 |
Mediator; vy) jen Date: O. lk. | Kristan Diefenbach, M.S.; Child Custody Recommending Counselor
NO OBJECTION HAVING BEEN MADE, THE ABOVE AGREEMENT IS APPROVED. THE PARTIES ARE HEREBY ORDERED TO COMPLY WITH ITS TERMS.
Oy ene A, Ades Q-N\S-A | Judge Date
FL 1803535 _ Rassouli/Hajirassouliha
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”