Petition to Compromise Minor’s Claim
8
(48)
Tentative Ruling
Re: Dhaliwal v. Thao Superior Court Case No. 26CU00867
Hearing Date: June 4, 2026 (Dept. 502)
Motion: Petition to Compromise Minor’s Claim
Tentative Ruling:
The court intends to grant the petition. (Code Civ. Proc., § 372; Prob. Code, § 2504.) Petitioner is directed to file new proposed orders within five days of service of the order by the clerk.
To set a status conference for Thursday, August 27, 2026, at 3:30 p.m. in Department 501, for confirmation of deposit of the funds into a blocked account. If the Acknowledgment of Receipt of Order and Funds for Deposit in Blocked Account (MC- 356), is filed at least five court days before the hearing, the status conference will come off calendar.
Explanation:
A petition for court approval under Code of Civil Procedure section 372, subdivision (a)(3), must comply with California Rules of Court, rules 7.950-7.955. (Cal. Rules of Ct., rule 3.1384.) The petition must state whether the petitioner was assisted by an attorney and disclose the attorney’s information and attorney’s fees. (Id., rule 7.951.) If the petition states the attorney has not received attorney’s fees, and the attorney expects to receive fees, the amount and the person expected to pay those fees mus t be listed. (Id., rule 7.951(5).)
Counsel for petitioner Avtar Dhaliwal is requesting reimbursement of costs and attorney’s fees, however, the calculated costs as indicated in Attachment 13(b) to th e petition is inconsistent with Items 10(c) and 16 in the petition and Item 8(a)(2) in the proposed order. Petitioner is directed to file a new proposed order (MC-351) with corrections at Item 8(a)(2) to reflect the calculated costs in the petition in Attachment 13(b) as $602.30. Accordingly, the total allowance for fees and expenses in item 8(a)(5) must be corrected to $12,836.99, and the balance of the proceeds to be disbursed to claimant Amritpal Dhaliwal must be corrected at Item 8(b)(1) and (2) to be $8,663.01.
Otherwise, the court approves the disposition of proceeds to a blocked account. However, a completed proposed order to deposit funds in a blocked account (MC-355) must be filed consistent with the aforementioned balance.
Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), and Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, subdivision (a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order
adopting this tentative ruling will serve as the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order.
Tentative Ruling
Issued By: KCK on 06/03 /26. (Judge’s initials) (Date)
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”