Motion to Quash Order for Examination
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA RG15794796: Yang VS Zhu 06/04/2026 Hearing on Motion to Quash Order for Examination; filed by Wen Yang (Cross-Defendant) CRS# 242927605526 in Department 22 Tentative Ruling - 06/03/2026 Han N. Tran The Hearing on Motion to Quash Order for Examination; filed by Wen Yang (Cross-Defendant) CRS# 242927605526 scheduled for 06/04/2026 is continued to 08/27/2026 at 02:30 PM in Department 22 at Rene C. Davidson Courthouse. Cross-Defendant Wen Yangs motion to quash order for examination is CONTINUED to August 27, 2026 at 2:30pm.
It appears that Yangs argument has merit that suspended corporation Y&Y Educare Development, Inc., not Yun Zhu, is the proper judgment creditor for purposes of a debtors examination under CCP § 708.110, but cannot act to collect the judgment while suspended. The court therefore continues this motion and the scheduled order for appearance and examination to give Cross-Plaintiff Yun Zhu time to revive Y&Y from its suspended status. HOW DO I CONTEST A TENTATIVE RULING? THROUGH eCOURT Notify the Court and all the other parties no later than 4:00 PM one court day before the scheduled hearing, and briefly identify the issues you wish to argue through the following steps: 1.
Log into eCourt Public Portal 2. Case Search 3. Enter the Case Number and select Search 4. Select the Case Name 5. Select the Tentative Rulings Tab 6. Select Click to Contest this Ruling 7. Enter your Name and Reason for Contesting 8. Select Proceed BY EMAIL Send an email to the DEPARTMENT CLERK (dept22@alameda.courts.ca.gov) and all the other parties no later than 4:00 PM one court day before the scheduled hearing. This will permit the department clerk to send invitations to counsel to appear remotely.
Notice via BOTH eCourt AND email is required. The tentative ruling will become the ruling of the court if no party contests the tentative ruling.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”