DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV115749·alameda·Civil·Discovery Dispute
Hearing 3 months agoThe parties are ORDERED TO APPEAR to discuss the appointment of a discovery referee or the scheduling of Plaintiffs’ discovery motions for future hearing.

BESS, et al. vs TAM, et al.

Motion to Compel FURTHER DISCOVERY RESPONSES AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS

Hearing date
Jun 4, 2026
Department
23
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJoyce Obasohan
Defendant237 Wayne Street LLC

Attorneys

Joyce Obasohanfor Plaintiff

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA 25CV115749: BESS, et al. vs TAM, et al. 06/04/2026 Hearing on Motion to Compel FURTHER DISCOVERY RESPONSES AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT 237 WAYNE STREET LLC AND THEIR COUNSEL; filed by Joyce Obasohan (Plaintiff) CRS# 541951105515 in Department 23 Tentative Ruling - 06/02/2026 Ruben Sundeen The parties are ORDERED TO APPEAR to discuss the appointment of a discovery referee or the scheduling of Plaintiffs’ discovery motions for future hearing.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share