DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV000007·alameda·Civil·Contract
Hearing 3 months agoGRANTED

U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, A NATIONAL BANKING ASSOCIATION, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO MUFG UNION BANK, N.A., vs WANG, et al.

Motion to Strike Portions of Cross-Complaint Filed by Jie Wang

Hearing date
Jun 4, 2026
Department
23
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Strike rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffU.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, A NATIONAL BANKING ASSOCIATION, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO MUFG UNION BANK, N.A.
DefendantJie Wang

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA 25CV000007: U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, A NATIONAL BANKING ASSOCIATION, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO MUFG UNION BANK, N.A., vs WANG, et al. 06/04/2026 Hearing on Motion to Strike Portions of Cross-Complaint Filed by Jie Wang; filed by U.S. BANK, National Association, a national banking association, successor by merger to MUFG UNION BANK, N.A., (Cross-Defendant) CRS# 750143215686 in Department 23 Tentative Ruling - 06/01/2026 Ruben Sundeen The Motion to Strike (not initial pleading) Portions of Cross-Complaint filed by Jie Wang filed by U.S. BANK, National Association, a national banking association, successor by merger to MUFG UNION BANK, N.A., on 09/29/2025 is Granted. Plaintiff and cross-defendant U.S. Bank, National Association (“Bank”) moves to strike the request for punitive damages in the Cross-Complaint.

The Court may, on any terms it deems proper, strike from any pleading “irrelevant, false, or improper matter” inserted into the pleading, as well as “all or any part of any pleading not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state, a court rule, or an order of the court.” (Code Civ. Proc. §436.)

“In order to justify an award of exemplary damages, the defendant must be guilty of oppression, fraud or malice.” (Silberg v. California Life Ins. Co. (1974) 11 Cal.3d 452, 462, citing Civil Code § 3294.) “He must act with the intent to vex, injure or annoy, or with a conscious disregard of the plaintiff’s rights.” (Id.)

Defendant and cross-complainant Jie Wang’s (“Wang”) seeks punitive damages in connection with the second cause of action for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The second cause of action alleges that the Bank breached the implied covenant in the subject promissory note by refusing to accept mortgage payments that would have cured Wang’s default. (See Cross-Complaint ¶¶ 12-15.) The Cross-Complaint does not allege conduct by the Bank that rises to the level of oppression, fraud, or malice, or plead any acts by the Bank indicating that it acted with the intent to injure Wang or acted in conscious disregard of Wang’s rights. Wang did not oppose this motion or identify any allegations that could support a claim for punitive damages.

Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED. The Court hereby STRIKES Wang’s request for punitive damages. *If a party does not timely contest the tentative ruling and appear at the hearing, the tentative ruling will become the order of the Court.*

How to Contest a Tentative Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA 25CV000007: U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, A NATIONAL BANKING ASSOCIATION, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO MUFG UNION BANK, N.A., vs WANG, et al. 06/04/2026 Hearing on Motion to Strike Portions of Cross-Complaint Filed by Jie Wang; filed by U.S. BANK, National Association, a national banking association, successor by merger to MUFG UNION BANK, N.A., (Cross-Defendant) CRS# 750143215686 in Department 23 Through the eCourt Public Portal To contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court and all parties no later than 4:00 p.m. one court day before the scheduled hearing, and briefly identify the issues you wish to argue by completing the following steps: 1. Log in to the eCourt Public Portal.

2. Select Case Search.

3. Enter the case number and select Search.

4. Select the case name.

5. Select the Tentative Rulings tab.

6. Click “Contest This Ruling.” 7. Enter your name and reason for contesting.

8. Select Proceed. You must also notify the department and all opposing parties by 4:00 p.m. one court day before the hearing. Notice to the department must be sent to: Dept23@alameda.courts.ca.gov. Remote Appearance Information For Department 23 Zoom appearance information, please visit: https://eportal.alameda.courts.ca.gov/?q=node/397/1152402 Please provide this information to any self-represented or opposing parties.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share