DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV117175·alameda·Civil·Case Management
Hearing 3 months agoPlaintiff admonished to comply with CRC 3.110(g) and (h); matter continued to 09/15/2026 for Case Management Conference.

CROSSROADS EQUIPMENT LEASE AND FINANCE, LLC vs VIRK TRANS CARRIER, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, et al.

Case Management Conference re Entry of Default

Hearing date
Jun 3, 2026
Department
520
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Sep 15, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCROSSROADS EQUIPMENT LEASE AND FINANCE, LLC
DefendantVIRK TRANS CARRIER, INC.

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA 25CV117175: CROSSROADS EQUIPMENT LEASE AND FINANCE, LLC vs VIRK TRANS CARRIER, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, et al. 06/03/2026 Case Management Conference re Entry of Default in Department 520 Tentative Ruling - 06/01/2026 Jamilah A. Jefferson ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT The Court has ordered the following after review of the case. The Court makes the following Order after review of the case including any timely filed CMC Statements, without a conference:

On MARCH 02, 2026, this court admonished Plaintiff to timely comply with CRC 3.110(g) and (h) in requesting entry of default and default judgment. Plaintiff has failed to do so.

CRC 3.110 (g) provides: “Request for entry of default- If a responsive pleading is not served within the time limits specified in this rule and no extension of time has been granted, the plaintiff must file a request for entry of default within 10 days after the time for service has elapsed. The court may issue an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed if the plaintiff fails to timely file the request for the entry of default.”

CRC 3.110(h) provides: “When a default is entered, the party who requested the entry of default must obtain a default judgment against the defaulting party within 45 days after the default was entered, unless the court has granted an extension of time. The court may issue an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed if that party fails to obtain entry of judgment against a defaulting party or to request an extension of time to apply for a default judgment within that time.”

Plaintiff must seek entry of defendant(s)’ default before the next CMC Statement is due or an OSC in re DISMISSAL for failure to comply with the CRC and the orders of this court may issue. Case Management Conference status of default/judgment is scheduled for 09/15/2026 at 10:10 AM in Department 520 at Hayward Hall of Justice. Clerk is directed to serve copies of this order, with proof of service, to counsel and to selfrepresented parties of record. The Court orders counsel to obtain a copy of this order from the eCourt portal.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share