DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26682089·sf·Civil·Unlawful Detainer
Hearing 3 months agoOFF CALENDAR. Premature.

KEVIN VED VS. TRI VAN LE ET AL

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, UNLAWFUL DETAINER

Hearing date
Jun 3, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Judgment rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffKEVIN VED
DefendantTRI VAN LE
DefendantAscencio

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26682089 - June 3, 2026 Hearing date: June 3, 2026 Case number: CUD26682089 Case title: KEVIN VED VS. TRI VAN LE ET AL Case Number: | | CUD26682089 | Case Title: | | KEVIN VED VS. TRI VAN LE ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-06-03 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, UNLAWFUL DETAINER | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for June 3, 2026. Line 16.

PLAINTIFF KEVIN VED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, UNLAWFUL DETAINER is OFF CALENDAR. Premature. Motion for summary judgment may be made at any time after the Answer is filed. (CCP 1170.7.)

On the same day this motion was filed, Plaintiff filed an amendment to the Complaint naming a new defendant, Ascencio, who had not yet answered.

The Court also notes that for all future motions, the moving party must comply with LRSF 2.7B and provide courtesy copies of all moving papers to department 501. The department received copies of the proposed order only in connection with this motion. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share