Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Defendant To Further Respond To Form Interrogatories--General
Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26681439 - June 3, 2026 Hearing date: June 3, 2026 Case number: CUD26681439 Case title: JALASAI BAPU, LLC VS. SHANE SLEEPER ET AL Case Number: | | CUD26681439 | Case Title: | | JALASAI BAPU, LLC VS. SHANE SLEEPER ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-06-03 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Defendant To Further Respond To Form Interrogatories--General | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for June 3, 2026. Line 12.1. PLAINTIFF JALASAI BAPU, LLC Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Defendant To Further Respond To Form Interrogatories--General Hearing Required.
Parties to appear in-person in department 505 at 1:00 p.m. on June 3, 2026 and engage in meaningful meet and confer efforts. Parties to report their progress at 1:30 p.m. Parties shall have a copy of separate statement indicating all resolved issues, to be handed to the Court. This matter will be heard in department 505 by the Honorable Michelle Tong at 1:30 p.m. per the order of the presiding judge. =(501/MT)
Parties may appear in-person, or via Zoom Video Conference (Meeting ID: 160 4132 4666 Passcode: 872834). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”