DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26PB-0033338·shasta·Probate·Trust Administration
Hearing 3 months agoDENIED

IN RE: THE YERGENSON FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST OF 2001

Petition for Order Confirming Trust Assets

Hearing date
Jun 1, 2026
Department
44
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 26PB-0033338 This matter is on calendar for hearing on a Petition for Order Confirming Trust Assets. The matter has been properly noticed with proof of service on file. No objections have been raised. The Petition fails to establish that the Trustor intended to hold the subject property in Trust. The basis for the Petition is that, because the Trustor executed a pour-over will, he had a present intent to hold the subject property in the 16

name of the Trust. A pour-over will indicates an intent that any property not held in Trust at time of death be devised to the Trust after death. A pour-over will does not support a present intent to hold the subject property in the name of the Trust during the decedent’s lifetime. No other evidence was provided to show the decedent had a present intent to hold the subject property in Trust while he was living. The Petition is DENIED without prejudice. The clerk is instructed to close the file. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

IN RE: EDWARD H. YOUNG AND JUDY J. YOUNG 2010 FAMILY TRUST

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share