DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25PB-0033060·shasta·Probate·Estate
Hearing 3 months agoCONTINUED

ESTATE OF STEPHEN PEAY

First and Final Report of Administrator on Waiver of Account and Petition for Final Distribution

Hearing date
Jun 1, 2026
Department
44
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jul 6, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$8,464.45

Parties

OtherStephen Peay
OtherCarol Van Pelt

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 25PB-0033060 This matter is on calendar for hearing on the First and Final Report of Administrator on Waiver of Account and Petition for Final Distribution. The matter has been properly noticed with proof of service on file. No objections have been raised. A waiver of account has not been submitted for the heir, Carol Van Pelt. The Court notes the basis for calculating statutory compensation is incorrect and fails to account for the gains and losses on sale. The total basis for calculating statutory compensation is $273,222.51 (Inventory and Appraisal $263,452.51 + gains on sales $10,250 – losses on sales 450).

This results in compensation payable to the Personal Representative and Counsel of $8,464.45. As the resulting statutory compensation is a higher than the amount requested in the Petition, the Court will overlook the defect. The matter is continued to Monday, July 6, 2026, at 2:30 p.m. in Department 44 for further proceedings regarding the First and Final Report of Administrator on Waiver of Account and Petition for Final Distribution. The requirement of an accounting must be properly waived or completed.

Petitioner is required to file and serve a new Notice of Hearing for the continued hearing date on all parties entitled to notice. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

ESTATE OF HAROLD ROBERTSON

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share