DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
23PB-0032240·shasta·Probate·Estate
Hearing 3 months agoCONTINUED

ESTATE OF STUART BENNETT

Confirmation of filing Inventory and Appraisal

Hearing date
Jun 1, 2026
Department
44
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 17, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$250.00

Parties

OtherStuart Bennett

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 23PB-0032240 This matter is on calendar for confirmation of filing the Inventory and Appraisal and Status of Administration. The amended Final Inventory and Appraisal filed on May 22, 2026, is not accepted by the Court. The Inventory and Appraisal is incomplete regarding the Statement About the Bond. No Petition for Final Distribution has been filed. A properly noticed Status Report has been filed stating that additional time is needed before the documents can be filed. The Court notes the Status Report was noticed for August 17, 2026.

The matter is continued to Monday, August 17, 2026, at 2:30 p.m. in Department 44 for confirmation of filing the Inventory and Appraisal and Status of Administration. If a Final Inventory and Appraisal and Petition for Final Distribution cannot be filed prior to the next hearing, the Court ORDERS the Personal Representative to timely file and serve a Status Report with proper Notice of Hearing in compliance with Probate Code § 12200 et seq. Failure to do so may result in the issuance of an Order to Show Cause Re: Monetary Sanctions of $250.00 for failure to timely file the Final Inventory and Appraisal, failure to timely close the estate administration, and failure to comply with the Court’s order.

No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

ESTATE OF BRIAN BENTLEY

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share