Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice x 3
There is no proof of service showing service of any of the moving papers on the client. In addition, the submitted proof of service shows that only the declaration was served, and only on the opposing party. (See ROA 188, 191.) Further, the notice of motion and motion provide that Sean Dowsing and Bayan Salehi move to be relieved as counsel of record, but only a declaration by Sean Dowsing has been submitted. Due to the defects above, the motion to be relieved as counsel of record is DENIED, without prejudice. Moving attorney to give notice.
105 Kowalczyk vs. Gracey
25-01471642 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice x 3 The unopposed applications of attorneys (1) Mitchell Schuster, (2) Stacey Ashby, and (3) Milton Otto of Meister Seelig & Fein PLLC to appear pro hac vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Edward Kowalczyk and The Fifth Veda, Inc. are GRANTED. Moving attorneys met the requirements of California Rules of Court, rule 9.40. Moving attorneys to give notice
106 Pacific Carpets, LLC vs. Panku, Inc.
22-01245791 Motion for Attorney Fees Defendants 2525 Main Apartment, LP (“2525 Main”); Panku, Inc.; ASD Capital Management, LP; and Assured Management, LLC (collectively, “Defendants”) move for an order granting them attorney fees in the amount of $98,445.00 incurred in the appellate matters arising from the instant action against Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant Pacific Carpets, LLC pursuant to Civil Code section 1717.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”