Petition for Writ of Mandate
LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: JUNE 1, 2026 TIME: 8:30 A.M.
TENTATIVE RULINGS ARE NOT POSTED IN UNLAWFUL DETAINER CASES
Notice to prevailing parties: Local Rule 2.10.01 requires you to submit a proposed formal order incorporating, verbatim, the language of any tentative ruling – or attaching and incorporating the tentative by reference - or an order consistent with the announced ruling of the Court, in accordance with California Rule of Court 3.1312. Such proposed order is required even if the prevailing party submitted a proposed order prior to the hearing with two exceptions: (1) in unopposed matters where the moving party has provided a detailed proposed order or JCC form of order, or (2) where the tentative is simply to “grant”. Failure to comply with Local Rule 2.10.01 may result in the imposition of sanctions following an order to show cause hearing, if a proposed order is not timely filed.
No. 26CV00698
DOMENIK v. DMV
PETITIONER FOR WRIT OF MANDATE
The parties are ordered to appear. The Court notes there is no administrative record lodged (only exhibits to the verified complaint) and despite a notice of hearing to respondent, there is no opposition to the petition nor any reply. Parties shall advise if this matter is proceeding and the Court shall set a briefing schedule and a date for petitioner to lodge the administrative record. (Gov. Code § 11523; Elizabeth D. v. Zolin (1993) 21 Cal.App.4th 347, 354.)
No. WC003394
PACIFIC CREDIT v. HERNANDEZ
MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT
Defendant’s motion to set aside the default judgment and renewal of judgment is granted.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”