Petition to Compromise Minor’s Claim
(49) Tentative Ruling
Re: McDaniel v. Athenix Phsyicians Group, Inc. et al. Superior Court Case No. 21CECG02886
Hearing Date: June 2, 2026 (Dept. 502)
Motion: Petition to Compromise Minor’s Claim
Tentative Ruling:
To grant. Petitioner Susan McDaniel is directed to file a new proposed order approving compromise, and order to deposit by 5:00 p.m., Friday, June 5, 2026. No appearances are necessary.
To set a status conference for Tuesday, September 1, 2026, at 3:30 p.m., in Department 501, for confirmation of deposit of the minor’s funds into a blocked account. If an Acknowledgment of Receipt of Order and Funds for Deposit in Blocked Account (MC-356) is filed at least five court days before the hearing, the status conference will come off calendar.
Explanation:
The petition appears to be sufficiently stated. However, the proposed orders require attention. On the Order Approving Compromise, under item 9.a., the name of the bank for the blocked account needs to be added; and item 9.c.(2) needs to be checked with the proper date of birth entered. On the Order to Deposit, only one option should be checked at item 5.
Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), and Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, subdivision (a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will serve as the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order.
Tentative Ruling
Issued By: KCK on 06/01/26. (Judge’s initials) (Date)
7
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”