DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25632305·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing 3 months agoOVERRULED, in part and SUSTAINED with and without leave to amend.

622 NINETEEN AVE LLC VS. MARY TRAN ET AL

DEMURRER to COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Jun 2, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Mixed

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

Plaintiff622 NINETEEN AVE LLC
DefendantMARY TRAN

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for June 2, 2026. Line 7. DEFENDANT MARY TRAN, AN INDIVIDUAL DEMURRER to COMPLAINT is OVERRULED, in part and SUSTAINED with and without leave to amend.

The First and Third Causes of Action are sustained with leave to amend for Plaintiff to allege additional facts supporting that the loan in question was a consumer loan. The Court notes, however, that it is not convinced that Plaintiff, an LLC, qualifies as a borrower of a consumer loan. While the statute does not explicitly restrict borrowers to natural persons by name, the purpose-based definition-requiring proceeds to be used "primarily for personal, family, or household purposes"-is inherently inapplicable to a business entity like an LLC. While Plaintiff is correct that the definition for consumer loans hinges entirely on the intended use of the proceeds and not the legal identity of the borrower, an LLC as a legal entity is distinct from its members, has no "personal" life, no "family," and no "household." An LLC borrows for business purposes by its very nature.

The Court further notes that Plaintiff is suing for libel per se. For an LLC to prevail on a libel per se claim, the allegedly defamatory statement must be injurious to the LLC's business reputation on its face.

The Second cause of action for Violation of Business and Professions code section 17200 is overruled. Plaintiff alleges sufficient facts under the fraudulent prong. (Complaint, paras. 18-19, 24-27, 45-47, 51,52.)

The Fourth Cause of Action for Declaratory Relief is sustained without leave to amend. The declaratory relief sought is duplicative of the first and the third cause of action for violation of section 22750 and restitution. (Complaint, para. 69.)

The Fifth cause of action is for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress is sustained without leave to amend. As a matter of law, a limited liability company cannot bring, nor can it maintain, a cause of action for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress. (Huntingdon Life Scis., Inc. v. Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty USA, Inc. (2005) 129 Cal.App.4th 1228, 1260.) Plaintiff failed to state any authority which would permit nonparties such as principles and members of an LLC, to be included on Plaintiff's cause of action.

The Sixth cause of action is for Libel per se is overruled. Plaintiff alleges Defendant falsely accused Plaintiff LLC of nonpayment, which on demurrer the Court takes as true. (Complaint, paras. 91-75.) =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share