DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CVPG19-0030230·shasta·Probate·Successor Guardianship
Hearing 3 months agoCONTINUED

Guardianship of Alden Gigax & Cian Justinger

Petition for Appointment of Successor Guardian of the Persons

Hearing date
Jun 1, 2026
Department
42
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jun 22, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerRidge Gigax
OtherAlden Gigax
OtherCian Justinger

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: CVPG19-0030230 This matter is on calendar for further proceedings on a Petition for Appointment of Successor Guardian of the Persons. The Petition was filed by the minors’ uncle, Ridge Gigax. Letters of

Temporary Guardianship were issued on March 26, 2026, and are set to expire today unless further extended. The current Guardian is Patricia Schoepflin, who has passed away.

A new Notice of Hearing has not been filed for today’s date. There is no proof of service of the Notice of Hearing and Petition for the paternal grandparents of Alden or paternal grandparents of Cian. Insufficient information has been provided to permit the Court to dispense with notice to these parties. These parties may be served by mail. Prob. Code § 1511(c). Alternatively, the above parties can sign a consent and waiver of notice (GC-211, section 4), in lieu of being served.

The Court has reviewed the Court Investigator’s report filed on April 21, 2026, which recommends granting the Petition. The Court will inquire whether the child is or may be an Indian child. If Petitioner has reason to know that the child is an Indian child, they must make further inquiry to learn about the child’s Indian heritage. The mother has filed an objection to the Petition. Additionally, the mother has filed a Petition for Termination of Guardianship currently set for hearing on June 22, 2026.

In light of the objection and Petition for Termination, the Court will appoint the Public Defender as counsel for the minors. The matter is continued to Monday, June 22, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. in Department 42 for further proceedings on the Petition for Appointment of Successor Guardianship of the Persons and confirmation of counsel. The Temporary Guardianship is ORDERED to remain in effect until the continued hearing date. Petitioner is required to file and serve a new Notice of Hearing for the continued hearing date, along with a copy of the Petition, on the parties identified above.

In the alternative, if Petitioner cannot serve the parties identified, the Court will require a declaration explaining in detail all efforts of Petitioner to locate and serve them and why they cannot be served, to permit the Court to dispense with notice. Warning: Failure to properly effect service or provide adequate basis to dispense with service as to the necessary parties will result in denial of the Petition. Notice is preserved. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

GUARDIANSHIP OF MARY LEIB

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share