DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CVG-02609·shasta·Civil·Forfeiture
Hearing 3 months agoDENIED

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA VS. MCCON

Motion to Set Aside Summary Judgment Discharge Forfeiture and Exonerate Bail

Hearing date
Jun 1, 2026
Department
63
Prevailing
Opposing Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

DefendantUnited States Fire Insurance

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 25CVG-02609 Tentative Ruling on Motion to Set Aside Summary Judgment Discharge Forfeiture and Exonerate Bail: Defendant United States Fire Insurance moves to set aside summary judgment, discharge forfeiture, and exonerate bail. No opposition has been filed. A nearly identical Motion was filed in this matter on January 27, 2026. It was on calendar for hearing on February 23, 2026 and again on April 27, 2026. Both times, the Court informed Defendant that personal service on the County was necessary in order for the motion to proceed. The Motion was denied without prejudice. Defendant filed this Motion on May 6, 2026. There is no proof of service indicating that the County has been personally served. The motion is DENIED without prejudice. The proposed order will be modified.

PONCIANO, ET AL. VS. MARX, ET AL.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share