DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
23CV-0203722·shasta·Civil·Construction
Hearing 3 months agoDEFERRED

SHANE HUGHES CONSTRUCTION, INC. VS. BUSH

Motion to Restore Status Quo Ante

Hearing date
Jun 1, 2026
Department
63
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jun 15, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffShane Hughes Construction, Inc.
DefendantAmber Bush

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 23CV-0203722 Tentative Ruling on Motion to Restore Status Quo Ante: Plaintiff Shane Hughes Construction, Inc. moves to stay the matter and return it to the status quo ante as of March 9, 2026. The motion is based on a bankruptcy filing by Defendant Amber Bush. A Notice of Stay of Proceedings (Judicial Council form CM-180) has not been filed. This is a mandatory form. Additionally, the Court has not been provided with any documents related to the bankruptcy case or the bankruptcy case number. While Plaintiff listed Exhibits 1-4 in the moving papers, no exhibits were provided. Without this information, the Court is not able to stay the matter or grant the motion. However, should proper proof be provided, the Court intends to stay the matter as of the date of the bankruptcy filing.

Plaintiff is directed to file a Notice of Stay of Proceedings with a copy of the Notice of Commencement of Case, the bankruptcy petition, or other document showing that the stay is in effect, and showing the court, case number, debtor, and petitioners. Ruling on the motion is DEFERRED. The Court intends to rule on the motion when the Notice of Stay of Proceedings has been filed, or on June 15, 2026, whichever is sooner. The matter will be on calendar on Monday, June 15, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 63 for status of the case and potential bankruptcy stay. The clerk is directed to vacate the July 6, 2026 review hearing.

WILLIAMS VS. FOUNDATION PHYSICIANS MEDICAL GROUP, ET AL.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share