DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
308·orange·Civil·Civil
Hearing 3 months agoCONTINUED

Law Offices of Joseph P. McGinley vs. Falck Mobile Health, Inc.

Motion Directing Interpleading of Funds

Hearing date
Jun 1, 2026
Department
C24
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jul 6, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffLaw Offices of Joseph B. McGinley
DefendantFalck Mobile Health, Inc.

Attorneys

Joseph B. McGinleyfor Plaintiff

Ruling

The court will hear from the parties at the hearing as to scheduling of a date for the evidentiary hearing and a continued date for the CMC.

Defendants shall give notice.

308 Law Offices of Before the court is an unopposed Motion Directing Joseph P. Interpleading of Funds (Motion) filed by plaintiff McGinley vs. Law Offices of Joseph B. McGinley (Plaintiff). The Falck Mobile hearing is CONTINUED to July 6, 2026 at 1:30pm. Health, Inc. Plaintiff has not filed the subject funds with the court. The Motion is based upon Code of Civil Procedure sections 386 and 386.5. Under those code sections and for the court to grant the Motion, the moving party must provide an affidavit that it was no interest in the funds it seeks to deposit with the court.

The affidavit is also required for the party to recover attorney fees under Code of Civil Procedure section 386.6, subdivision (a). The declaration of Joseph B. McGinley does not contain the required statements. The hearing is continued for Plaintiff to file and timely serve a supplemental affidavit that complies with the code.

The CMC is continued to 7/6/26 at 1:30pm.

Plaintiff shall give notice.

311 Moon vs. Before the Court is a motion by Petitioners Peter TruAbutment Moon and Haengoh Kim in which they seek an Inc. order entering a judgment on their Petition for Writ of Mandamus To Compel Inspection of Corporate Books and Records. The Petition is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part, as set forth herein.

On December 29, 2025, Petitioners filed a Petition seeking an order that Respondents TruAbutment Inc., Hyung T. Park, Sang H. Yoo, Hyung Ick Kim, Stella K. Kim, and Ron Nguyen “produce electronically to Petitioners' attorney's, Cadden &

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share