Application for right to attach order
the request is GRANTED as to the existence of and legal effects of the records, but not as to the truth of any disputed facts asserted therein. (Ev. Code §452(d) [court records]; Fontenot v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA (2011) 198 Cal.App.4th 256, 264; Arce v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. (2010) 181 Cal.App.4th 471, 482.) Defendant has not shown judicial notice of the transcript (Ex. 2) is proper. Defendant’s request for judicial notice as to Exhibit 2 is thus DENIED.
Plaintiffs’ Request for Judicial Notice: To the extent Plaintiffs seek judicial notice of court pleadings, filings, and orders, the request for judicial notice is GRANTED as to the existence of and legal effects of the records, but not as to the truth of any disputed facts asserted therein. (Ev. Code §452(d) [court records]; Fontenot v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA (2011) 198 Cal.App.4th 256, 264; Arce v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. (2010) 181 Cal.App.4th 471, 482.) Plaintiffs’ request for judicial notice is DENIED to the extent it seeks judicial notice of declarations and evidentiary materials, including the private investigator report, as Plaintiffs have not shown such materials are proper subjects of judicial notice.
Evidentiary Objections: Defendant’s Objection No. 1 is SUSTAINED. Defendant’s Objection Nos. 2-3 are OVERRULED. Defendant’s Objection Nos. 4-20 are SUSTAINED as to lack of authentication.
Request to Strike, Seal, or Redact (ROA 37): Given the court’s ruling to sustain Defendant’s objections to Plaintiffs’ exhibits, it does not appear to the court that a separate order striking the materials as requested is necessary. To the extent Defendant seeks an order sealing the materials under California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551, the request is not properly supported as no declaration was submitted with the request. (See CRC rule 2.551(b)(1) [motion to seal must be accompanied by a declaration containing facts sufficient to justify the sealing].) The request to seal or redact is DENIED without prejudice.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Counsel for Defendant shall give notice. 5 Cali Dumpling The application by plaintiff Cali Dumpling Management, LLC for a Management, right to attach order against defendant Star Leaf Oto, LLC is LLC v. Star DENIED, without prejudice. Leaf Oto, et. al There is no proof of service in the Court’s file showing that either the complaint or the application have been served on Star Leaf Oto, LLC. (Code of Civil Procedure §482.070; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1300(c) - proof of service must be filed at least five court days prior to the hearing.)
Plaintiff shall give notice. 6 Jahangiri v. Cont. to 8/31. Vahidramezani 7 Hallett v. Before the Court at present is the “Motion For Order Requiring Waterfront Vexatious Litigant And Pro-Per Plaintiff Darrell Hallett To Furnish Resort Security Pursuant To CCP §391.3,” filed on 12/23/25 by defendants