Case Management Conference
June 1, 2026, Case Management Conference Tentative Rulings
1. CL0002584 Geico General Ins. Company vs. Sebastian Deleon-Mariscal, et al. No appearances are required. A default prove up hearing is set for July 24, 2026, at 1:30 p.m., in Department 6.
2. CL0003359 Navigators Specialty Ins. Company vs. Michael Andrew Ricaurte No appearances are required. A default prove up hearing is set for July 31, 2026, at 1:30 p.m., in Department 6.
3. CL0003562 Jefferson Capital Systems LLC vs. Anne Lucq Appearances are required for status regarding dismissal. If the parties wish the court to retain jurisdiction, they should file a written stipulation under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 or state their agreement regarding the same on the record.
4. CL0003710 Capital One N.A. vs. Alan Chidley No appearances are required. The Court dismisses this matter without prejudice and retains jurisdiction pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6.
5. CU0000316 Mardi L. Fisher v. Brandon O. Williams, et al. Appearances are required. The parties shall be prepared to update the Court on the status of this litigation.
6. CU0001949 Loma Rica Center, LLC vs. Hudson Excess Insurance Company, et al. Appearances are required. The parties shall be prepared to update the Court on the status of arbitration.
7. CU0002107 Sheng Wang Chen vs. Federick Boey, et al. No appearances are required. On the Court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to September 14, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., in Department 6. Neither party filed a timely case management conference statement and all are admonished that failing to file a statement in the future may result in sanctions. Plaintiff shall serve notice of the continued court date.
8. CU0002134 Ian Frederick Russell v. Rachel Kathleen Leyesque No appearances are required. A request for dismissal has been filed. This matter is dismissed without prejudice. The order to show cause issued to Plaintiff is dismissed in the interests of justice.
9. CU0002242 Kelly L. Hall vs. Matthew A. Mantovan Hudgens No appearances are required. On its own motion, the Court continues the case management conference to September 14, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., in Department 6. Defendant Western Surety Company has not filed a response to the first amended complaint. Defendant Western Surety Company shall file a responsive pleading, or Plaintiff shall file a request for default (as appropriate) or request for dismissal of Defendant at least two weeks prior to the continued
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”