Status Review of Settlement
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF MERCED
Limited Civil Judge Pro Tem Alexandria Carl Courtroom 9
627 W. 21 st Street, Merced
Monday, June 1st, 2026 1:30 p.m.
Case No. Title / Description
24CV-06534 [Parties’ names withheld pursuant to CCP § 1161.2(a)(1)]
Status Review of Settlement
Appearance required. Appear to address status of settlement. On May 30, 2025, Plaintiff filed a settlement agreement indicating that Defendant’s final payment for past due rent was due on February 1, 2026. If no party appears, the Court will dismiss the action while retaining jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6.
25CV-01267 Discover Bank vs. Patricia Harrison
Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
The unopposed motion for judgment on the pleadings by plaintiff Discover Bank is GRANTED without leave to amend the answer. (Code Civ. Proc., § 438, subd. (c)(1)(A).) The Court finds that the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action for breach of written contract against defendant Patricia Harrison. Defendant’s answer admits all statements of the complaint and does not allege any facts constituting a The following tentative rulings shall become the ruling of the court unless a party gives notice of intention to appear as follows: 1. You must call (209) 725-4240 to notify the court of your intent to appear.
2. You must give notice to all other parties before 4:00 p.m. of your intent to appear. Per California Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1), failure to do both items 1 and 2 will result in no oral argument. Note: Notifying CourtCall (the court’s telephonic appearance provider) of your intent to appear does not satisfy the requirement of notifying the court.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”