Motion for Approval
Plaintiff is ordered to give notice of this ruling.
16 30-2025-01532976 The preliminary ruling is that plaintiff Daniel Chaffin’s Chaffin vs. Socal unopposed motion will be GRANTED upon resolution of the Superbikes issues below.
The court has the following questions and concerns that plaintiff must address in an amended proposed order which plaintiff must provide within five (5) days of this ruling:
1. Add page and paragraph numbers to the Notice.
2. The Notice should be identified and attached to the proposed order as an exhibit. ROA 61 ¶ 2.
3. The proposed order must identify the correct judicial officer and remove the attorney information on the caption page.
4. The footer of the proposed order should reflect the full document title.
17 30-2018-00982195 Continued to 6/10/26 Aresh vs. Hunt
18 30-2021-01186203 Continued to 6/10/26 Henkin vs. Mikles
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”