Lawrence vs. The Cape Series at Aliso Viejo Maintenance Corporation

25

estoppel, or judicial estoppel. Defendants’ disagreements with the Court’s prior rulings are not a proper subject of a motion for judgment on the pleadings. Tentative Ruling: Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is DENIED. Moving Defendants to give notice.

11 Lawrence vs. The Cape Series at Aliso Viejo Maintenance Corporation

2023-01314623 Motion for Bifurcation Continued to 07/13/2026 by stipulation. 12 Lee vs. Hyundai Motor America

2025-01521906 1. Motion to Compel Arbitration 2. Case Management Conference

Defendant Hyundai Motor America (HMA) moves to compel plaintiff Sang Jik Lee to arbitrate his claims and to stay the action pending the outcome of arbitration pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act (9 U.S.C. § 1, et seq.) (FAA) and the California Arbitration Act (Code Civ. Proc., § 1281, et seq.) (CAA). Procedural issues Plaintiff has not submitted a signed proof of service showing the opposition was served on HMA. (See Code Civ. Proc. § 1005, subd. (b); Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1300, subd. (c).)

As HMA filed a reply, HMA does not appear to have been prejudiced by Plaintiff’s failure to do so. In the future, the Court may decline to consider documents unaccompanied by the required proof of service. HMA’s request for judicial notice In support of its motion, HMA requests judicial notice of the following documents (ROA 22): (1) Plaintiff Sang Jik Lee’s Complaint, filed on or about 10/27/25. (2) Hyundai’s 2024 Owner’s Handbook and Warranty Information.