DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
1194430·santabarbara·Civil·Conservatorship
Hearing 4 months agoCONTINUED

Conservatorship of Dayna Polk

Review Investigator's Report

Hearing date
May 5, 2026
Department
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Apr 20, 2027
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherDayna Polk

Ruling

Hearing Date / Time Tue, 06/02/2026 - 09:00 Nature of Proceedings Review Investigator's Report Tentative Ruling Probate Notes: No appearances are required. The court investigator's report has been received and recommends that the conservatorship continue. The next review hearing will be held on June 1, 2027. The Court will give notice of time of hearing and department. Appearances: The court is open to the public for court business. The court is also conducting hearings via Zoom videoconference.

Meeting ID: 160 543 3416 Passcode: 5053334 Tentative Ruling: Conservatorship of Dayna Polk Tentative Ruling: Conservatorship of Dayna Polk Case Number 1194430 Case Type Conservatorship Hearing Date / Time Tue, 05/05/2026 - 09:00 Nature of Proceedings Review Investigator's Report Tentative Ruling Probate Notes: The court investigator's report has been received and recommends that the conservatorship continue. No appearance is required. The next review hearing will be held on April 20, 2027, at 9:00 a.m. in the court identified above.

Appearances: The court is open to the public for court business. The court is also conducting hearings via Zoom videoconference. Meeting ID: 160 543 3416 Passcode: 5053334 Tentative Ruling: Tiburcio v. Velazquez Tentative Ruling: Tiburcio v. Velazquez Case Number 24CV00460 Case Type Minor/Disabled Person's Compromise Hearing Date / Time

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share