DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV008471·sacramento·Civil·Complex Civil
Hearing over 1 year agoCONTINUED

HUDSON vs SUPERIOR VISION SERVICES, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, et al.

Case Management Conference

Hearing date
Mar 14, 2025
Department
22
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 29, 2025
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffHUDSON
DefendantSUPERIOR VISION SERVICES, INC.

Ruling

24CV008471: HUDSON vs SUPERIOR VISION SERVICES, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, et al. 03/14/2025 Case Management Conference in Department 22

Tentative Ruling

NO APPEARANCE REQUIRED. The Court sets a further CMC as set forth below.

The Court notes that only Plaintiff filed a Case Management Statement. Given the representation by Plaintiff that mediation has been scheduled for July, the Court will continue this CMC. However, in the future, the parties are expected to file a JOINT Case Management Statement as set forth in the Court's General Complex Case Standing Order. The Statement shall be filed at least 15 days before the next CMC.

Please check your tentative ruling before the next Court date at www.saccourt.ca.gov.

Please note that the Complex Civil Case Department now provides information to assist you in managing your complex case on the Court website at https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/civil/complex-civil-cases.aspx. The Court strongly encourages parties to review this website regularly to stay abreast of the most recent complex civil case procedures. Please refer to the website before directly contacting the Court Clerk for information.

FURTHER CONFERENCE A Case Management Conference is scheduled for 08/29/2025 at 10:30 AM in Department 22.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share