DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV116728·alameda·Civil·Product Liability
Hearing 3 months agoHearing set for 8/28/26. Written objection to dismissal due by 8/17/26.

NASER, AN INDIVIDUAL v. TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION

OSC in re DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Hearing date
May 29, 2026
Department
520
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 28, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffNASER
DefendantTOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC.

Ruling

25CV116728: NASER, AN INDIVIDUAL vs TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION 05/29/2026 Case Management Conference Re: Filing of Dismissal(s) in Department 520

Tentative Ruling - 05/26/2026 Jamilah A. Jefferson

ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT

The Court has ordered the following after review of the case.

OSC in re DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT was filed on DECEMBER 05, 2025 indicating dismissal would be filed not later than MARCH 05, 2026. It has not been filed.

Hearing on this OSC in re DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT is set for 8/28/26 at 3pm in Dept. 520.

WRITTEN OBJECTION TO DISMISSAL showing GOOD CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed must be filed by 8/17/26. Failure to do so may result in permanent dismissal of this action and forfeiture of any and all claims raised in the complaint.

Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal is scheduled for 08/28/2026 at 03:00 PM in Department 520 at Hayward Hall of Justice.

Clerk is directed to serve copies of this order, with proof of service, to counsel and to selfrepresented parties of record. The Court orders counsel to obtain a copy of this order from the eCourt portal.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share