Motion to Compel Arbitration
56 Lehman vs. All Known and Unknown Claimants to 17121 Palmdale Lane, Huntington Beach, California 92647, Including the Estate of Leif Gyldstrand, Successor Trustees, Heirs
25-01533470 Motion to Quash Service of Summons
The motion of specially appearing defendant Melissa Gyldstrand for an order quashing service of the summons and complaint is off-calendar as MOOT. Plaintiff Travis Lehman dismissed this specially appearing defendant from the action without prejudice on May 18, 2026.
57 La Paz Village Investors, LLC vs. Orange County Realtors, Inc.
26-01538551 Motion for Preliminary Injunction & Motion for Temporary Restraining Order
Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant La Paz Village Investors, LLC (“LPVI”)’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ROA 22) is GRANTED in part.
Defendant/Cross-Complainant Orange County Realtors (“OCR”) Application for Preliminary Injunction (ROA 44) is also GRANTED in part.
The Motions:
LPVI seeks a preliminary injunction ordering OCR and all of its agents, contractors, representatives, employees and all persons acting in concert with it to (1) prevent OCR from further altering the status quo as it existed when this lawsuit was filed, (2) prevent OCR from engaging in any construction, on or within the boundaries LPVI’s property located at 25250, 25252, 25254, and 25758 La Paz Road, Laguna Hills, California (APNs 620-211-09, 620-211-15, 620-211-17 and 620-211-18, respectively) (collectively, the “LPVI Property”), (3) prevent OCR from further violating, interfering, or obstructing LPVI’s easement for ingress and egress over OCR’s property at 25552 La Paz Road, Laguna Hills, California (APN 620-211-19), (4) prevent OCR from further depriving LPVI of the benefits of prevailing in this action, and (5) require OCR to immediately remove all encroachments, improvements, construction materials, fencing, and other physical intrusions that OCR has placed or caused to be placed on the LPVI Property and within the LPVI Easement, and to restore the affected areas to pre-encroachment condition.
OCR moves for a preliminary injunction ordering LPVI and Nicholas Buchanan not to interfere with OCR’s efforts to remove construction debris and allegedly vandalized wall bracing, fill and remediate an open trench, repair damaged asphalt, and otherwise remediate the disputed construction area to address what OCR contends is an ongoing public safety hazard. OCR also seeks permission to complete the remediation work while providing indemnity and additional insured protections to LPVI during the work.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
“The general purpose of a preliminary injunction is to preserve the status quo pending a determination on the merits of the action. [Citation.] ‘ “The granting or