DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV1907·eldorado·Civil·Civil
Hearing 3 months agoCONTINUED

RUTH HAYNES ET AL vs. ASHLEY SPENCER ET AL

Motion for Trial Preference

Hearing date
May 29, 2026
Department
Dept. 9
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffRUTH HAYNES
DefendantASHLEY SPENCER

Ruling

May 29, 2026 Dept. 9 Tentative Rulings

7. 25CV1907 RUTH HAYNES ET AL vs. ASHLEY SPENCER ET AL MOTION FOR TRIAL PREFERENCE

Plaintiff filed this motion for trial preference pursuant to CCP § 36 which states

(a) A party to a civil action who is over 70 years of age may petition the court for a preference, which the court shall grant if the court makes both of the following findings:

(1) The party has a substantial interest in the action as a whole.

(2) The health of the party is such that a preference is necessary to prevent prejudicing the party's interest in the litigation.

Defendant’s opposition disputes only whether the health of the Plaintiff is such that a preference is necessary to prevent prejudice. The court finds Plaintiff has sufficiently established the health of the Plaintiff requires preference based on the nature of the injury in combination with the age of the Plaintiff.

TENTATIVE RULING #7: APPEARANCES REQUIRED FRIDAY, MAY 29, 2026, AT 8:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT NINE.

12

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share