Lina Elisabeth Scott v. Shawn Mitchell Scott

This matter is set for hearing on Respondent/Father’s Request for Order (“RFO”) re child custody/visitation regarding the parties’ sons, Weston (DOB 9/19/2013) and Leo (DOB 6/1/2017).

The parties were both interviewed by Family Court Services (“FCS”), and FCS filed its Report & Recommendations with the Court on 5/13/2026. Petitioner/Mother filed a Responsive Declaration on 5/18/2026 in which she disagrees with virtually all of the FCS recommendations. On 5/19/2026 Father filed a Statement of Agreement/Disagreement in which he states the parties reached an agreement regarding legal custody and timeshare and references an attachment agreement; however, the agreement is not attached so the Court has no idea what the agreement is, or whether Mother is actually in agreement.

Appearances required.

SO ORDERED.

Any party who disagrees with the Court's tentative ruling and wishes to have oral argument must notify the Court at (415) 444-7046 and opposing counsel (or if the opposing party is selfrepresented, notice must be given directly to the opposing party) of their intent to appear at the hearing for oral argument by 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing, as required by Marin County Superior Court Family Law Local Rules 7.12(B) and (C). Notice may be given by telephone or in person. Absent proper notice, no oral argument will be permitted. If no request for oral argument is made, the tentative ruling will become the order of the Court.

Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, persons who requested oral argument must appear for the hearing in person or remotely via Zoom, in accordance with the Court website guidelines. If appearing remotely via Zoom (video or telephone), you are responsible for ensuring you have

adequate connectivity; the Court may proceed in a party’s absence if technical issues arise. Proper Zoom etiquette and courtroom decorum are required, and failure to comply may result in the hearing being halted and an order to appear in person being made.