DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25-01535570·orange·Civil·Civil
Hearing 3 months agoVACATED

Xu vs. EQUITATION ROYALE LLC

Motion - Other (For Order Permitting Service of Summons)

Hearing date
May 29, 2026
Department
C12
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffXu
DefendantEQUITATION ROYALE LLC

Ruling

7. Toluca Pointe, LLC vs. Woodruff

25-01496483

Motion to Quash Subpoena

Defendants Kimberly Woodruff and David Woodruff’s motion to quash third party subpoena is DENIED as moot.

Plaintiff has withdrawn the subpoena Defendants seek to quash. Accordingly, there is no pending subpoena for the Court to quash.

This motion remains on calendar, however, because Defendants seek monetary sanctions. Additionally, Plaintiff seeks sanctions. Plaintiff argues it is entitled to sanctions due to Defendants’ refusal to withdraw the motion after the challenged subpoena was withdrawn.

The court declines to award monetary sanctions to any party.

Moving Party Defendants to give notice of this ruling.

8. Xu vs. EQUITATION ROYALE LLC

25-01535570

Motion - Other (For Order Permitting Service of Summons)

VACATED

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share