Motion to Quash Subpoena
7. Toluca Pointe, LLC vs. Woodruff
25-01496483
Motion to Quash Subpoena
Defendants Kimberly Woodruff and David Woodruff’s motion to quash third party subpoena is DENIED as moot.
Plaintiff has withdrawn the subpoena Defendants seek to quash. Accordingly, there is no pending subpoena for the Court to quash.
This motion remains on calendar, however, because Defendants seek monetary sanctions. Additionally, Plaintiff seeks sanctions. Plaintiff argues it is entitled to sanctions due to Defendants’ refusal to withdraw the motion after the challenged subpoena was withdrawn.
The court declines to award monetary sanctions to any party.
Moving Party Defendants to give notice of this ruling.
8. Xu vs. EQUITATION ROYALE LLC
25-01535570
Motion - Other (For Order Permitting Service of Summons)
VACATED
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”