DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25-01477200·orange·Civil·Contract
Hearing 3 months agoCONTINUED

Pesner vs. Redhead

Motion to Consolidate

Hearing date
May 28, 2026
Department
C33
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jun 27, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Attorneys

Gonchegulianfor Plaintiff

Ruling

3 25-01477200 Motion to Consolidate

Pesner vs. Redhead Plaintiff Gary Pesner’s motion to consolidate this action with Adam Redhead v. Gary Pesner, OCSC Case No. 30-2025-01477388 for all purposes is CONTINUED to _______[30 days from 5/28/26].

On 2/26/26, the Court continued the hearing on the Motion to allow Plaintiff to comply with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.350(a)(2)(B). In an attempt to comply with Rule 3.350(a)(2)(B), Plaintiff has successfully served Restoration Heroes SPV, LLC and Restoration Heroes, Inc. but has been unsuccessful in serving Karel Taska. (Gonchegulian Decl., ¶ 4.) Plaintiff requests a 30-day continuance to effectuate service on Karel Taska which is granted.

Plaintiff to give notice. 5 25-01504437 Demurrer to Complaint

Brad Dean Sanders as Defendant Alexander B. Sanders, as personal representative of Estate of Trustee of the Powell James B. Sanders’ demurrer to plaintiff Brad Dean Sanders, as trustee of Family Trust vs. The Powell Family Trust’s complaint is OVERRULED in part and Alexander B. Sanders SUSTAINED in part with 20 days leave to amend. as Personal Representative of Estate of James Baron Defendant’s request for judicial notice Sanders In support of its demurrer, Defendant requests judicial notice of the following documents: - Exhibit A - Petition for Instructions filed with the Contra Costa Superior Court on May 17, 2024, Case No. 24-00848. - Exhibit B - Brad Dean Sander’s Creditor’s Claim filed with the Orange County Superior Court on Feb. 4, 2025, Case No. 30- 2024-01402031-PR-LA-CMC. - Exhibit C - Herbert Rothman’s Creditor’s Claim a filed with the Orange County Superior Court on Sep. 5, 2024, Case No. 30- 2024-01402031-PR-LA-CMC.

Judicial notice may be taken of court records. (Cal. Evid. Code § 452, subd. (d).)

The Court GRANTS Defendant’s request for judicial notice.

Whether Plaintiff’s claims are time-barred

“Upon a person’s death, Code of Civil Procedure section 366.2 ‘provides for an outside time limit of one year for filing any type of claim against a decedent.’” (Estate of Holdaway (2019) 40 Cal.App.5th 1049, 1053 [citation omitted].)

Specifically, section 366.2, subdivision (a) provides:

If a person against whom an action may be brought on a liability of the person, whether arising in contract, tort, or otherwise, and whether accrued or not accrued, dies before

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share