Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record
Here, Plaintiff contends there is a triable issue as to whether Hartman’s use of the offensive nicknames was “despicable” and whether Hartman was a “managing agent” of Red hat. Plaintiff cites evidence that Hartman, a Senior Sales Manager, was responsible for assigning accounts and in fact Hartman reassigned accounts from Plaintiff to a younger sales rep. (Opp. at p. 14.) Plaintiff also argues that Red Hat’s HR manager Katherine Foley was a managing agent who was responsible for enforcing corporate anti-harassment policy. (Id. at p. 15.)
Plaintiff has adequately demonstrated a triable issue as to whether Hartman’s conduct was despicable and whether Hartman and/or the HR team members who responded to his complaint were managing agents who ratified Hartman’s conduct. Therefore, the motion is denied as to this issue. 10 22-01269208 Demurrer to Complaint
Moran vs. Torelli Defendant Michael B. Meyer’s Demurrer is CONTINUED to September Realcorp 3, 2026.
“A notice of motion to strike a demurrer, or a portion thereof, shall set the hearing thereon concurrently with the hearing on the demurrer.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 435(b)(3).)
Defendant filed a Demurrer and Motion to Strike on March 16, 2026. The Motion to Strike is currently set for hearing on September 3, 2026. Thus, the hearing for Defendant’s Demurrer is continued to September 3, 2026 to be heard concurrently with the Motion to Strike. 11 24-01442293 Motion to Deem Facts Admitted
Palacios vs. North OFF CALENDAR Orange County Community College District Foundation 12 21-01218115 1) Motion for Sanctions 2) Motion for Terminating Sanctions – OFF CALENDAR Raggins vs. Kia America, Inc. 13 25-01460291 Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record
Uptown Newport MOTION WITHDRAWN Building Owner, LP vs. Saldo
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”