REITH v. DARE

LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: MAY 28, 2026 TIME: 8:30 A.M.

TENTATIVE RULINGS ARE NOT POSTED IN UNLAWFUL DETAINER CASES

Notice to prevailing parties: Local Rule 2.10.01 requires you to submit a proposed formal order incorporating, verbatim, the language of any tentative ruling – or attaching and incorporating the tentative by reference - or an order consistent with the announced ruling of the Court, in accordance with California Rule of Court 3.1312. Such proposed order is required even if the prevailing party submitted a proposed order prior to the hearing with two exceptions: (1) in unopposed matters where the moving party has provided a detailed proposed order or JCC form of order, or (2) where the tentative is simply to “grant”. Failure to comply with Local Rule 2.10.01 may result in the imposition of sanctions following an order to show cause hearing, if a proposed order is not timely filed.

No. 26CV01553

U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. ASHFORD SCOTTS VALLEY LP, et al.

(UNOPPOSED) APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT OF RECEIVER AND ISSUING TRO AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 526 and 564, subd. (b)(9) and (11), and Civil Code section 2938, the unopposed application is granted. The Court will sign the proposed order as submitted. Bond of $10,000.00 shall be filed no later than June 30, 2026.

No. 25CV04130

REITH v. DARE

(UNOPPOSED) DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS

The motion is denied without prejudice. “The papers filed in support of a motion or demurrer must consist of at least the following:”: the motion itself, a notice of hearing on the motion, and a memorandum of points and authorities in support of a motion. (Weil & Brown Civil Proc. Before Trial (TRG 2025) §9:28, Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1112(a).) Here, defendant filed a one-page document titled “motion compel responses to special interrogatories and request for production of documents and for monetary sanctions” and a declaration from counsel with attached exhibits but did not file the required notice of motion or a memorandum of points and authorities. Therefore, the Court cannot grant the motion as requested.