DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV174875·alameda·Civil·Writ of Mandate
Hearing 3 months agoCONTINUED

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION vs OAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Demurrer to First Amended Petition for Writ of Mandate; Motion to Strike portions of first amended petition for writ of mandate

Hearing date
May 27, 2026
Department
25
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jun 24, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffCALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
RespondentOAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Ruling

26CV174875: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION vs OAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 05/27/2026 Case Management Conference in Department 25

Tentative Ruling - 05/22/2026 Jenna Whitman

ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT

The Court has ordered the following after review of the case.

PARTIES TO APPEAR at 3:30 p.m., not 4:00 p.m. as originally scheduled.

The Court will be unavailable to hear the pleadings motions in July and is inclined to advance the hearing as set forth below.

Department 25 is inviting you to a scheduled meeting. Please sign onto Zoomgov.com using credentials below.

Meeting ID: 161 8066 1142 Passcode: 3803

The Hearing on Demurrer to First Amended Petition for Writ of Mandate; filed by Oakland Unified School District (Respondent) CRS# 053187956235 scheduled for 07/24/2026 and the Hearing on Motion to Strike portions of first amended petition for writ of mandate; filed by Oakland Unified School District (Respondent) CRS# 622747393171 scheduled for 07/24/2026 are continued to 06/24/2026 at 03:30 PM in Department 25 at Rene C. Davidson Courthouse.

The Court orders counsel to obtain a copy of this order from the eCourt portal.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share