DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26-UDL-00113·sanmateo·Civil·Unlawful Detainer
Hearing 3 months agoGRANTED

ALVERNAZ PARTNERS, LLC VS. NICOLE GRUNBERG, ET AL

DEFENDANT NICOLE GRUNBERG’S MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT AND DEFAULT JUDGMENT , RECALL WRIT OF POSSESSION AND QUASH NOTICE TO VACATE

Hearing date
May 28, 2026
Department
2
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffALVERNAZ PARTNERS, LLC
DefendantNICOLE GRUNBERG

Attorneys

TODD L SCHULTZfor Plaintiff

Ruling

5/28/26 - Law and Motion Calendar Judge Mark A. McCannon – Department 2 Page 17 of 19

UD LAW AND MOTION CALENDAR THURSDAY, MAY 28, 2026

2:00 PM LINE: 1 26-UDL-00113 ALVERNAZ PARTNERS, LLC VS. NICOLE GRUNBERG, ET AL

ALVERNAZ PARTNERS, LLC TODD L SCHULTZ NICOLE GRUNBERG PRO SE

DEFENDANT NICOLE GRUNBERG'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT AND DEFAULT JUDGMENT, RECALL WRIT OF POSSESSION AND QUASH NOTICE TO VACATE

TENTATIVE RULING:

Defendant’s motion to set aside the default and default judgment, and to recall the writ of possession, is GRANTED pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (d). Defendant shall file and serve her responsive pleading within the time provided by Code of Civil Procedure section 418.10, subdivision (c).

If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court. Thereafter, counsel for the prevailing party shall prepare a written order consistent with this ruling for the Court’s signature, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312, and provide notice of the ruling to all appearing parties as required by law. The Court further directs the parties’ attention to revised Local Rule 3.403(b)(iv) (eff. Jan. 1, 2024) regarding the form of proposed orders.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share