DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV469136·santaclara·Civil·Civil
Hearing 3 months agoDENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Dawne Shackelford v. Ameer Alghusain

motion to stay proceedings due to pending criminal proceedings

Hearing date
May 28, 2026
Department
10
Prevailing
Opposing Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffDawne Shackelford
DefendantAmeer Alghusain

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 10 Honorable Jeffrey B. El-Hajj Blanca Than, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408-882-2210

DATE: May 28, 2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. / 9:01 A.M. To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. Make sure to let the other side know before 4:00 P.M. that you plan to contest the ruling. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1); Local Rule 8.D.)

**Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and counsel**

Line 8 25CV469136 Dawne Shackelford Plaintiff’s motion to stay proceedings due to pending criminal v. Ameer Alghusain proceedings. The motion is not accompanied by a proof of service, and no defendant has been served the summons and complaint. The motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. For the court to determine whether to stay proceedings, the court needs more information about the pending criminal proceedings. Information about those proceedings must be made under penalty of perjury (e.g., by sworn declaration), preferably also accompanied by documentation from the criminal proceedings.

Further, to the extent any claims in this civil action may be subject to arbitration, the moving party must submit evidence regarding the existence of a binding arbitration agreement. The court will prepare the order. - oo0oo - 9:01 A.M. LINE # CASE # CASE TITLE RULING Line 1 2004-1-CV- American Contractors Order of examination: parties ordered to appear. 017343 Indemnity Company v. Contractors Bond Brokerage I Line 2 2004-1-CV- American Contractors Order of examination: parties ordered to appear. 017343 Indemnity Company v.

Contractors Bond Brokerage I Line 3 2015-1-CV- Vishal Gobhil et al. v. Order of examination: parties ordered to appear. 288617 IDC Technologies, Inc. (“IDC”) et al. Line 4 2015-1-CV- Vishal Gobhil et al. v. Order of examination: parties ordered to appear. 288617 IDC Technologies, Inc. (“IDC”) et al.

- oo0oo -

4

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share