DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV03211·santacruz·Civil·Collection
Hearing 3 months agoGRANTED

CREDITORS ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, INC. v. BROOKDALE RESORTS INC.

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH ITS DEMAND FOR IDENTIFICATION, PRODUCTION, INSPECTION AND COPYING OF DOCUMENTS, AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS

Hearing date
May 21, 2026
Department
Judge
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$1,075.45

Parties

PlaintiffCREDITORS ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, INC.
DefendantBROOKDALE RESORTS INC.

Ruling

LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: MAY 21, 2026 TIME: 8:30 A.M.

TENTATIVE RULINGS ARE NOT POSTED IN UNLAWFUL DETAINER CASES

Notice to prevailing parties: Local Rule 2.10.01 requires you to submit a proposed formal order incorporating, verbatim, the language of any tentative ruling – or attaching and incorporating the tentative by reference - or an order consistent with the announced ruling of the Court, in accordance with California Rule of Court 3.1312. Such proposed order is required even if the prevailing party submitted a proposed order prior to the hearing with two exceptions: (1) in unopposed matters where the moving party has provided a detailed proposed order or JCC form of order, or (2) where the tentative is simply to “grant”. Failure to comply with Local Rule 2.10.01 may result in the imposition of sanctions following an order to show cause hearing, if a proposed order is not timely filed.

No. 24CV03211

CREDITORS ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, INC. v. BROOKDALE RESORTS INC.

(UNOPPOSED) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH ITS DEMAND FOR IDENTIFICATION, PRODUCTION, INSPECTION AND COPYING OF DOCUMENTS, AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS

The unopposed motion is granted. Defendant Brookdale Resorts Inc. is ordered to produce responsive documents to document request nos. 1 and 3 no later than June 22, 2026, in compliance with its promise to produce. (Garcia Declaration ¶¶ 2-8.)

Sanctions are imposed against defendant Brookdale Resorts Inc. in the amount of $1,075.45, payable no later than June 22, 2026. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2023.010, subd. (d), 2023.030, subd. (a).)

No. 24CV03113

HOLLOWAY v. SAN LORENZO VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, et al.

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE

The writ petition is denied.

I. BACKGROUND

Petitioner Bruce Holloway contends that respondent San Lorenzo Valley Water District (“District”) violated the Brown Act by failing to disclose a nearly $100,000.00 severance

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share