DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
23CECG00025·fresno·Civil·Discovery Dispute
Hearing 3 months agoCONTINUED

Perez v. Perez et al.

By Plaintiff Abel Perez to Compel Further Responses from Defendants Roberto Perez and Nina Perez

Hearing date
May 21, 2026
Department
403
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jun 30, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffAbel Perez
DefendantRoberto Perez
DefendantNina Perez

Ruling

(35) Tentative Ruling

Re: Perez v. Perez et al. Superior Court Case No. 23CECG00025

Hearing Date: May 21, 2026 (Dept. 403)

Motion: By Plaintiff Abel Perez to Compel Further Responses from Defendants Roberto Perez and Nina Perez

Tentative Ruling:

To continue to June 30, 2026, 3:30 p.m. in Department 502. To sua sponte strike papers filed by defaulted defendant Roberto Perez, filed May 13, 2026.

If oral argument is timely requested, it will be entertained on Thursday, May 28, 2026, at 3:30 p.m. in Department 403.

Explanation:

Following a successful appeal on an order of demurrer sustained without leave to amend, on April 1, 2025, plaintiff Abel Perez (“Plaintiff”) filed a Second Amended Complaint. On December 4, 2025, Plaintiff obtained leave to file a Third Amended Complaint. On December 10, 2025, Plaintiff filed a Third Amended Complaint. On March 16, default was entered against defendant Roberto Perez. On April 27, 2026, Plaintiff filed the instant motions against both of defendants Roberto Perez and Nina Perez. On May 13, 2026, the court improvidently filed papers filed by defendant Roberto Perez.

The papers are ordered stricken. Whether defendant Roberto Perez remains defaulted will alter the outcome of the present discovery motions. Defaulted parties concede the allegations of the pleadings, mooting any further need for general discovery. The matter is continued to June 2, 2026, to coincide with the reserved hearing on a motion to set aside default.

Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), and Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, subdivision (a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will serve as the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order.

Tentative Ruling

Issued By: lmg on 05/20/26. (Judge’s initials) (Date)

7

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share