DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CV2025-1542·yolo·Civil·Discovery
Hearing 3 months agoCONTINUED

Genshlea v. FCA US LLC

two motions to compel further responses

Hearing date
May 26, 2026
Department
Fourteen
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jul 28, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJoseph Genshlea
DefendantFCA US LLC

Ruling

Case: Genshlea v. FCA US LLC Case No. CV2025-1542 Hearing Date: May 26, 2026 Department Fourteen 9:00 a.m.

On the Court’s own motion, plaintiff Joseph Genshlea’s two motions to compel further responses (filed April 16, 2026) are CONTINUED to July 28, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. in Department Fourteen. The parties are DIRECTED to further meet and confer regarding the issues identified plaintiff’s motions – in person, by videoconference, or by telephone – by June 18, 2026. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2016.040, subd. (a) [“A meet and confer declaration in support of a motion shall state facts showing a reasonable and good faith attempt, either in person, by telephone, or by videoconference, to informally resolve each issue presented by the motion”]); see also Townsend v. Superior Court (1998) 61 Cal.App.4th 1431, 1434-1435 & 1439; Meagle decls., ¶¶ 4-8, Exhibits C & D; Graham decls., ¶¶ 5-7, Exhibits B-D.)

By July 2, 2026, plaintiff MUST file: (1) a new meet and confer declaration regarding the parties’ meet and confer efforts and any remaining issues for the Court’s determination; and (2) a separate statement regarding discovery still at issue. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1345.)

By July 16, 2026, defendant FCA US LLC may file a responsive meet and confer declaration and separate statement.

If there are no remaining issues, plaintiff is DIRECTED to request that the July 28, 2026, hearing be vacated.

4 of 5

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share