WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. vs. MICHAEL J. COLLETT
Defendant’s Motion to Compel Specific Performance of Fiduciary Duty
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
Case No. CL25-08206
Defendant’s Motion to Compel Specific Performance of Fiduciary Duty
The Parties are to appear.
The Parties are to address whether Plaintiff was properly served with Defendant’s motions. The Court has reviewed Defendant’s filing on April 9, 2026 attaching various proofs of service. (The Court also notes that at the May 26, 2026 hearing, Plaintiff’s Counsel appeared and stated that Plaintiff had not been served with the motions. There was no further discussion on the issue.)
EBONEE S. MARTIN; ET AL. vs. RONALD BRAZELL; ET AL.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”