DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24611746·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 3 months agoDENIED

M. DATTANI CREDIT TRUST VS. JOSEPH THEISEN ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Intervene

Hearing date
May 27, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Opposing Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffM. DATTANI CREDIT TRUST
DefendantJOSEPH THEISEN

Attorneys

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC24611746 - May 27, 2026 Hearing date: May 27, 2026 Case number: CGC24611746 Case title: M. DATTANI CREDIT TRUST VS. JOSEPH THEISEN ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24611746 | Case Title: | | M. DATTANI CREDIT TRUST VS. JOSEPH THEISEN ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-05-27 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Intervene; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for May 27, 2026. Line 2. OTHER CHRISTOPHER CALLAWAY Motion To Intervene; is DENIED.

Mr. Callaway's claims are directly related to the claims arising from the lease with Dattani in the 500 Laguna Action, which has been stayed due to Bankruptcy. Rights regarding 500 Laguna and that Lease are not the subject of this action by Dattani against Defendants. (CCP section 387(d)(1)(B).) =(501/DWH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share