DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV-0207907·shasta·Civil·Review Hearing - Status of Counsel
Hearing 3 months agoPending hearing

BAKER VS. TERRILL

Review hearing

Hearing date
May 26, 2026
Department
63
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffBaker
DefendantTerrill

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 25CV-0207907 This matter is on calendar for review regarding status of counsel. While a Motion to be Relieved was granted on April 27, 2026, Plaintiff’s counsel has not filed a Notice of Entry of Order and is therefore not relieved. Plaintiff’s counsel was ordered to provide notice of today’s hearing to all parties. There is nothing in the file to indicate that Plaintiff’s counsel did so. An appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

CITIBANK, N.A. VS. GARNICA, JR

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share