DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CVPS2506886·riverside·Probate·Breach of Contract
Hearing 3 months agoGRANTED. Requests 1 through 8, inclusive, in plaintiff’s requests for admissions are deemed admitted for all purposes in this litigation.

BANK OF AMERICA N.A. VS WIS

MOTION FOR ORDER TO DEEM MATTERS ADMITTED

Hearing date
May 27, 2026
Department
PS4
Judge
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffBANK OF AMERICA N.A.
DefendantWIS

Ruling

1. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME RC DESIGN MOTION FOR AN ASSIGNMENT INCORPORATED, A ORDER BY RC DESIGN CVPS2403180 CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS CORPORATION GREENE Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling. The motion does not comply with Local Rule 3316C. Parties wishing to argue the motion are ordered to appear. Appearance may be telephonic.

2. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION FOR ORDER TO DEEM JPMORGAN CHASE BANK CVPS2506648 MATTERS ADMITTED BY JPMORGAN N.A. VS WIGGINS CHASE BANK N.A. Tentative Ruling: Plaintiff JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s unopposed motion for an order deeming matters admitted is GRANTED. Requests 1 through 8, inclusive, in plaintiff’s requests for admissions are deemed admitted for all purposes in this litigation.

3. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION FOR ORDER TO DEEM BANK OF AMERICA N.A. VS CVPS2506886 MATTERS ADMITTED BY BANK OF WIS AMERICA N.A. Tentative Ruling: Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A.’s unopposed motion for an order deeming matters admitted is GRANTED. Requests 1 through 8, inclusive, in plaintiff’s requests for admissions are deemed admitted for all purposes in this litigation.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share