Case Management Conference; Motion to Strike
Plaintiff does not oppose Defendants’ requests. In fact, Plaintiff’s original moving memorandum of points and authorities concludes by requesting that the Court “retain the filing” of the SAC on 4/29/2025 “and/or to file the proposed Second Amended Complaint.” (ROA #133, Mot. P&A at p. 7.)
Indeed, on 11/13/2025, the Court already granted Defendants Lopez and Gallo’s motion to strike Plaintiff’s SAC filed on 4/29/2025 at ROA #102. (ROA #141.) Therefore, that SAC has already been stricken from the record, so there is no SAC currently on file in this case.
Accordingly, in granting Plaintiff leave to file the SAC now, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to separately file with the Court within 3 days of this ruling the proposed SAC attached to Plaintiff’s counsel’s declaration (ROA #133, Exh. B). The proposed SAC must be filed as a separate document to ensure it is properly indexed in the record.
The Court also ORDERS Plaintiff to serve all defendants with the properly filed SAC within 30 days. Defendants’ deadline to respond shall run from service of the properly filed SAC pursuant to this order.
Plaintiff shall give notice. 108 Siguenza vs.
1. Case Management Conference 24 Carrots, 2. Motion to Strike LLC MOTION OFF-CALENDAR PER STIPULATION; CMC 2020- CONTINUED TO 11/5/26 AT 9:30AM 01160884
109 Siguenza vs. Case Management Conference 24 Carrots, LLC CMC CONTINUED TO 11/5/26 AT 9:30AM
2020- 01168873
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”