DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
2020-01160884·orange·ComplexCivil·Case Management Conference
Hearing 3 months agoOFF-CALENDAR

Siguenza vs. 24 Carrots, LLC

Case Management Conference; Motion to Strike

Hearing date
May 21, 2026
Department
CX102
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Nov 5, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Strike rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSiguenza
Defendant24 Carrots, LLC

Ruling

Plaintiff does not oppose Defendants’ requests. In fact, Plaintiff’s original moving memorandum of points and authorities concludes by requesting that the Court “retain the filing” of the SAC on 4/29/2025 “and/or to file the proposed Second Amended Complaint.” (ROA #133, Mot. P&A at p. 7.)

Indeed, on 11/13/2025, the Court already granted Defendants Lopez and Gallo’s motion to strike Plaintiff’s SAC filed on 4/29/2025 at ROA #102. (ROA #141.) Therefore, that SAC has already been stricken from the record, so there is no SAC currently on file in this case.

Accordingly, in granting Plaintiff leave to file the SAC now, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to separately file with the Court within 3 days of this ruling the proposed SAC attached to Plaintiff’s counsel’s declaration (ROA #133, Exh. B). The proposed SAC must be filed as a separate document to ensure it is properly indexed in the record.

The Court also ORDERS Plaintiff to serve all defendants with the properly filed SAC within 30 days. Defendants’ deadline to respond shall run from service of the properly filed SAC pursuant to this order.

Plaintiff shall give notice. 108 Siguenza vs.

1. Case Management Conference 24 Carrots, 2. Motion to Strike LLC MOTION OFF-CALENDAR PER STIPULATION; CMC 2020- CONTINUED TO 11/5/26 AT 9:30AM 01160884

109 Siguenza vs. Case Management Conference 24 Carrots, LLC CMC CONTINUED TO 11/5/26 AT 9:30AM

2020- 01168873

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share