DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25-01472404·orange·Civil·Civil
Hearing 3 months agoOff-calendar

Lee vs. Kingsbury

None

Hearing date
May 21, 2026
Department
W15
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffLee
DefendantKingsbury

Ruling

To the extent Plaintiff fails to appear for her agreed upon deposition date, the Court reserves the right to impose the remaining $8,200 in requested attorney’s fees.

The Court orders the deposition to occur within the next 30 days and the sanctions for the Court Reporter’s costs to be paid within the next 30 days. If the deposition does not occur on a mutually agreeable date, moving parties are granted leave to re-file a motion for sanctions seeking the remaining $8,200 at issue here.

Other Discovery Motions Defendants Alter Domus, Inc. and Chris San (collectively “Defendants”) move the Court for an order compelling Plaintiff Nancy Simmons to respond to the following Defendants Requests for Production, Set One (“RFPs”), without objection. Defendants seek an order awarding monetary sanctions against Plaintiff in the amount of $5,449.

Defendants Alter Domus, Inc. and Chris San move the Court for an order compelling Plaintiff Nancy Simmons to respond to the following interrogatories propounded by Defendants, without objection: 1. Special Interrogatories, Set One. Defendants seek an order awarding monetary sanctions against Plaintiff in the amount of $5,295.

Defendants Alter Domus, Inc. and Chris San move the Court for an order compelling Plaintiff Nancy Simmons to respond to the following form interrogatories propounded by Defendants, without objection: 1.

2. Form Interrogatories - Employment, Set One; Form Interrogatories - General, Set One. Defendants seek an order awarding monetary sanctions against Plaintiff in the amount of $4,534.

It appears the Motions are moot. Plaintiff declares under penalty of perjury, that, “Concurrent with the filing of this opposition, I have worked with my counsel to prepare and verify complete responses to” the discovery at issue herein, “without objections”. (See Declaration(s) of Plaintiff Simmons.)

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share