MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE
# Case Name Tentative
1. BLATT VS. COUNTY OF ORANGE 2025-01481733 MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE
The Application of William D. Adams to Appear Pro Hac Vice for defendants County of Orange and Sierra Aviation Group, Inc. is GRANTED.
Moving attorney has satisfied all the requirements of California Rules of Court, Rule 9.40.
Moving attorney to give notice.
2. TC BROTHERS ENTERPRISES, INC. VS. BOWLERO CORPORATION 2023-01313029 1. MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO SPECIAL INTERRROGATORIES Defendant AMF Bowling Centers Inc.’s motion to compel plaintiff TC Brothers Enterprises, Inc. dba Servpro of Walnut, Hacienda Heights, Rowland Heights to serve responses to Defendant’s Special Interrogatories, Set One is DENIED as MOOT.
Plaintiff served verified responses without objections to Defendant’s Special Interrogatories, Set One, on December 8, 2025. (Reed Decl., ¶ 9.) Thus, the Motion is moot.
Defendant’s request for sanctions is DENIED. Plaintiff has shown it acted with substantial justification in submitting responses in a timely manner after counsel had a personal emergency.
Moving Defendant to give notice.
2. MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION Defendant AMF Bowling Centers Inc.’s motion to compel plaintiff TC Brothers Enterprises, Inc. dba Servpro Of Walnut, Hacienda Heights, Rowland Heights to serve verified, objection-free responses to Defendant’s Request for Production of Documents, Set One, is DENIED as MOOT.
Plaintiff served verified responses without objections to Defendant’s Request for Production of Documents, Set One, on December 8, 2025. (Reed Decl., ¶ 9.) Thus, the Motion is moot.
Defendant’s request for sanctions is DENIED. Plaintiff has shown it acted with substantial justification in submitting responses in a timely manner after counsel had a personal emergency.
Moving Defendant to give notice.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”